Archive for the ‘Articles’ Category

From: Alok Mohan < >

As received

I agree with Hamid Ansari.

“Muslims were always unsafe in India once Babar felt so unsafe he demolished Ram Mandir and built Babri mosque on it.

In 1705 two sons ( 6yr & 9yr ) of Guru Gobind Singh were bricked alive for haunting poor and unsafe Mughals.

Unsafe peaceful Muslims once skinned alive Sambhaji, son of Shivaji, for not converting.

In 1675 unsafe Aurangzeb beheaded 9th Sikh Guru right in the center of Delhi for not converting to RoP

Jinnah was unsafe in India and thus broke India into 3 pieces and created Pakistan.

In 1990 Kashmiri Muslims killed and drove out Kashmiri Pandits from Kashmir for making them feel unsafe

Once Passengers singing Bhajans in Sabarmati Express were torched alive by unsafe Peacefuls at Godhra.

Poor Muslim kid Mohammed Afroz who raped Nirbhaya was only given Sewing Machine & Rs. 10,000 shows insecurity of poor Muslims in India.

May be Kerala Muslims joined ISIS coz they feel scared of living in India

Muslims in India are so scared that they end up becoming President, VP, PM, Ministers.

Now they need separate planes for hajj too”

If Hamid Ansari Is Right then Why don’t Muslim shift to a safe place created for them by Nehrus and Gandhis of India after getting our people killed and our ancestral lands snatched?

Read Full Post »

From Rajput < >




“Don’t beat the dead snake!”, said my learned Hindu friend with his back towards the enemy.

He meant “Don’t harp on Partition. Forget it, and those who were killed are no more worth a fig!”


Yes, it is agonizing for most to confront a situation that is beyond our might to correct, or improve. Frustration mounts and finally one says, “Leave me alone. Delete my name from your list!”


But the more names we delete the worse gets the situation. The distant fires are approaching our house, too, however secular, celebrated or sophisticated we may be!


Recall the fate of such “superior bodies”, doctors, professors, millionaires and Excellencies, even “sants, sadhus and mahatmas” in Rawalpindi and Noakhali! ALAS, those who were meant to remind us are all “jackals and rats “with total memory loss! To most Akhand Bharat is already like a “dead snake”!

History’s countless Tsunamis have decapitated the Hindus and taken away the collective Head to deep depths. With that, “sank” the bonding, the unity, the collective response & responsibility- and the instinct of retaliation!


Hindus have to recreate that absent HEAD, stand united against threats to our existence. The threat to Hindus, collectively and individually, mounts in direct proportion to the number of desertions from the ranks!


If this situation is acceptable then we can foresee the fate of Delhi like that of Lahore and Karachi. But if this situation is unacceptable, that is, if we think we cannot surrender any more souls and LAND to our enemies, then what to do?


The question is relevant since while the Hindus are not interested in anybody’s religion, it is the missionaries and the maulvis who feel upset and provoked on seeing a Hindu. He/she is perceived a challenge to all what they stand, and trained, for!


Competition among the mullahs and missionaries is intense for the minds and souls of the confused & vulnerable Hindus.


In this respect we can compare two countries, Afghanistan and Bharat. In the former one needs a magnifying glass to spot a missionary or mahatma while in the latter they are growing and spreading like the mushrooms.


Finally, our enemies (a lot more than our friends!) have seen that the Hindus show NO interest in recovering the TERRITORY captured from them nor wish to recover the abducted and converted sisters and brothers who have gone over to the enemy side.


This apathy, neutrality and secularism boosts their zeal and enthusiasm to convert even more Hindus and capture even more territory of the Hindus (Bharat).

All this is worth thinking about if we wish to save the present borders, however ludicrous & ridiculous they are!

One more thought for all: If a lorry falls down the ravine in Himachal Pradesh, (notorious for bad roads!), a Court of Enquiry is immediately appointed to look into the circumstances, and to make recommendations on how to avoid similar mishaps in the future.


Surely Lahore and Dhaka were more than a lorry falling down the “khud” (ravine)! Yet NO court of enquiry has ever been convened as to how it (Partition) happened and HOW SUCH DISASTERS CAN BE PREVENTED IN THE FUTURE!


Even the cleverest Hindus seem to believe that BY SHUTTING THE EYES THE CAT DISAPPEARS!


Reason? Mental paralysis of the Hindu nation. When given the choice, “Gandhi or Bharat?”, and “Nehru or Hindus”? most Hindus will jump up with alacrity untypical of them, and say, “Gandhi and Nehru above all. Dump Hindusthan and the Hindus!”. (i.e., “Don’t beat the dead snakes!”)


Hence NO “post mortem” of Partition! Hence for the entire Hindu nation the invisible Damocles Sword still hangs overhead! (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sword_of_Damocles)


Government of West Bengal must hold an enquiry as to why Chittagong & Gilgit, Buddhist majority districts, were surrendered like the sheep to the wolves. And the Government of EAST Punjab must hold an enquiry as to why Lahore and Sri Nankana Sahib were surrendered to the intolerant followers of “Mohammed of Mecca”. And the Government of INDIA must order an enquiry as to why Pandit Nehru ordered “CEASE FIRE” when our own troops were advancing!



13 Aug 17


Read Full Post »

Bande Mataram Urdu Newspaper


Read Full Post »

From:  Deepak Das < >

How to identify dhimmi Hindus from truth tellers, copied from a FB post :
Dhimmi Hindus will say:
1) all religions are equal
2) terror has no religion
3) watches NDTV
4) considers mosque loud speakers for azaan harmless
5) ashamed of putting on a tilak
6) RSS is same as ISIS.
7) only Muslims were killed Godhra riots
8) consider Godhra train burning as an accident, not an act of jihad
9) we like Shahrukh Khan’s acting
And last but not the least and with due respect to PM
10) Considers gau rakshaks as the biggest threat to Hindustan, much higher than 26/11 terror act.

Read Full Post »

Is ancient India overrated ? A mind blowing analysis by Chinese Ex Professor from University of Toronto

Author: Pak L. Huide
Publication: Postcard.news
Date: July 22, 2017
Seriously? If anything, ancient India is sorely UNDERRATED.
I mean, I’m an ethnic Chinese living in Canada. But when I was growing up in Canada, I knew jackshit about India. Besides maybe curry.
I mean, people here have a vague understanding of Chinese history but they have NO idea about Indian history. For example, most people know that the Middle Kingdom is how China referred to herself but how many people know about Bharat? How many know about even the Guptas? People know that China was famous for ceramics and tea but how many people know about ancient India’s achievement in metallurgy? People k now about the Great Wall, but how many know about the great temples of southern India?
This is partly due to the lackluster historical records that ancient Indians kept and also partly because modern Indians have a tendency to look down upon their ancient heritage and view western ideas and ideals as superior. China also has this problem but not nearly to the same extent.
The discovery that the earth is spherical is credited to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, who was born in 384 BCE. However, very few people know that a man from ancient India established the idea of “spherical earth” during the 8th-9th century BCE. The man was called Yajnavalkya who first discovered that the earth is round. He was the first to propose the heliocentric system of the planets. In his work Shatapatha Brahmana, he proposed that the earth and the other planets move around the sun. He also calculated the period of one year as 365.24675 days. This is only 6 minutes longer than the current established time of 365.24220 days
Take the example of Kung Fu. The whole world knows about the martial art called Kung Fu. The person who founded Kung Fu was none other than a prince of the Pallava dynasty from Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu who visited China during the 5th century CE. He became th e 28th patriarch of Buddhism and established the Shaolin temple and founded the martial art which became world famous today. That prince was called Bodhidharma.
But how many people know about that Kung Fu and Shaolin was founded by an Indian? Precisely, if Indians are unaware of their heritage, why should they expect that someone else will know about their history and achievement?
The achievements of ancient Indians are lost in obscurity. India’s ancestors had invented many ways which eased the basic life of a commo n man. These inventions may seem primitive today, but we can’t ignore the fact that these were revolutionary achievements during their era.
The Indus Valley civilization is known for the broad and the sanitized drainage system which was no less than a miracle during those ancient times. But how many people know that the ancient Indians from Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) were the first to invent a flush toilet?
The people around the world use rulers to measure everything. How many people know that Indus Valley Civi lization was the first to invent the rulers? A ruler has been found at Lothal which is 4400 years old. Not only this, the people of IVC were the first to invent buttons. The world knows that the Chinese discovered the art of weaving silk dresses. How many people know that IVC people were the first to weave dresses made of cottons
The ancient Indians were first to invent the weighing scales. Archaeologists have discovered weighs and scales from the excavation sites of Harappa, Mohenjodaro, Lothal etc. These scales were extensively used for trading.
Ancient India has given Yoga to the world- which is widely practiced almost all over the world to keep people fit and fine. Models, supermodels, film stars, athletes, etc. regularly attends Yoga session to keep themselves fit.
Aryabhatta, Brahmagupta and Bhaskaracharya were the three eminent mathematicians from ancient India who established the concept of zero as a mathematical value in different eras. Brahmagupta was the first to invent a symbol for the value “shunya” (zero). Bhaskaracharya was the first to use it as algebra. The oldest inscription of zero can be found at the Chaturbhuj temple in Gwalior fort
Ancient Indians were pioneers in the field of chemistry too. The person who first invented the “atomic theory” was none other than Acharya Kanad from ancient India. He explained the atomic theory using terms like “Anu”(atom) and “Paramanu”(nucleus).
Ancient Indians were advanced in medical science too. The great physician of the time, Sage Shusrut was the first to carry out different surgeries which included plastic surgery and cataract surgery. His works are composed in his book called Shusrut Samhita (The works of Shusrut). The world hardly knows about Charak, the great specialist in medicine from ancient India. He was the first physician to establish the problems and medicinal treaties in fields like physiology, embryology, digestion, sexual disease, immunity, etc. His works on Ayurveda is composed as a book called Charak Samhita (The works of Charak).
The Chera dynasty of Tamil Nadu invented the idea of producing finest steel by heating black magnetite ore along with carbon. The mixture was kept in a crucible and heated in charcoal furnace. The Wootz Steel originated from India, but today, is popular as Damascus Steel.
India’s monuments are grand and are probably, the only way others recognize the importance of ancient Indian civilization. India’s gigantic monuments bear the testimony of the greatness of ancient India.
This is the Kailash Temple. It is a megalith which was constructed by cutting out a single rock- a mountain. The whole mountain was cut from the top to carve out the temple campus.
This is Dwarka, the grand and mysterious city submerged in the Arabian sea on the extreme west of India. The submerged heritage is no less than a treasure bearing the pride of Indian race!
This is Khajuraho, the marvel where the rocks has taken the form. The best of our monuments are not built on soft rocks like marble. Our ancestors carved out even the hardest of the rocks to give it a beauty.
The grandest and largest temple in India- Brihadeshwara temple. Breathtaking, isn’t it?
India is the land of grandest temples and breathtaking architectures. The heritage of India can’t be encapsulated within a small answer! To end the answer with, I will now share my personal favorite- The Sun Temple of Konark!
The main structure of the temple was partially destroyed by invaders like Kalapahad- a military general of the medieval period. Later, the prime structure totally collapsed when British stored gunpowder inside the structure and it caught fire accidentally.
Even though the main temple is gone, the amount of what left is still breathtaking by every means. Nobel Laureate Rabindranath Tagore wrote about Konark- “here the language of stone surpasses the language of man.”
The whole temple was designed like a huge chariot of Sun God having 24 wheels pulled by 7 horses. Each wheel had 8 major spokes denoting 1 prahar (Hindu time period of 3 hours). There was a huge magnet at the top of the temple which used to keep the idol of the Sun deity suspended in the air due to magnetic arrangement.
Still think, that ancient India is overrated?
Ancient India was a hub of culture and technology and the absolute capital of world spirituality. I could talk about India for hours. India is many things but OVERRATED is definitely not one of them.

Read Full Post »

How Do Christianity, Islam And Hinduism Compare?


There are different criteria on which one could compare those 3 religions. I want to focus here only on the most important one: which one of the three is closest to truth.

Christianity claims that the full truth has been revealed 2000 years ago only to Jesus Christ by the one Supreme Being (called God in English), and therefore truth is only with his Church. All must become Christians and follow what Christ said, if they want to be saved from hell.

Islam claims that the final truth has been revealed some 1400 years ago to Prophet Mohamed by the one Supreme Being (called Allah in Islam) and therefore Islam is the only true religion. All must become Muslims and follow what Prophet Mohamed said, if they want to be saved from hell.

Isn’t it strange that even in the 21st century those unsubstantiated claims about eternal hell for “others” are not debated and dismissed as superstition? Further, obviously at least one of those religions can’t be true, if not both – so why nobody mentions this? Yet instead of a debate on what is true, the “right to freedom of belief” is protected. It’s surely strange.

Now where does Hinduism stand? It usually is seen as inferior to the two big, established, ‘respected’, rich religions. And if one goes by common perception, Hinduism is mainly about caste system, sati and worshipping many gods, which (idol worship) is the greatest sin in both Christianity and Islam, because the Christian God and Allah are claimed to be jealous of other gods.

Hinduism is a rather new term. It was introduced by the British for the ancient traditions in India based on the Vedic texts.

Why was Hinduism introduced? Today’s ‘Indians’ were called Hindus earlier and even today are called Hindu in China. Hinduism would be akin to Germanism or Frenchism.

I got a clue why Hinduism was introduced, when I read that Voltaire, too, among many others in the west, praised the Vedas as the greatest gift to mankind and said “we are eternally indebted to India”. Voltaire fought against the influence of the Church and indeed, when the Vedas reached Europe, it had two effects: the influence of the Church went down and science took off in a big way (intriguingly, it is not mentioned today that those 2 effects could have anything to do with Vedic knowledge reaching the west).

Clearly, the Church was not amused that the intellectual elite preferred Vedic wisdom over Christianity. It needed some strategy to stop losing her sheep.

Now what is contained in the Vedas which are claimed to be as old as the universe? Veda (it means knowledge) is about what we need to know to live a meaningful, fulfilling life. Vedic knowledge is vast, though most of it has been lost by now. Vedas tell us even about maths, the age of the universe, of parallel universes, even the distance to the sun, how to analyse, how to connect with powers (devas) greater than humans, etc.

And most important, the Vedas tell us the truth about us, the Supreme Being and the universe.

The Vedas differs from the two other religions in a major point:

The Vedas claim that Brahman (Supreme Being) has become this universe. It means all is permeated by Brahman. All is essentially divine including our person. The names and forms are not really real. They appear only as real. Brahman alone is real, and Brahman is best described as sat-chit-ananda (blissful awareness). And the Upanishads, which are part of the Vedas, declare “Aham Brahmasmi” (I am Brahman), or “Ayam Atman Brahma”(This Atma is Brahman).

Does this claim make sense? Yes, it does. Quantum physics came meanwhile to the conclusion that all is one energy and that there are no separate entities anywhere. Incidentally, physicists like Schroedinger, Einstein, Heisenberg, etc. drew inspiration from the Vedas. So far, the Vedas were never proven wrong by science whatever was tested.

So the claim, that Brahman is the essence in all, is surely closer to the truth than the claim by Christianity and Islam that the Supreme is separate from his creation, including the human being, and will send all those who don’t believe in a certain book for eternity to hell. This Vedic claim of divinity in humans gives naturally inner strength to a human being and also kindness (as Brahman is in others, too).

Now why was Vedic knowledge suddenly made into a Hinduism, placed next and yet below the 2 big religions and associated from the start with a ‘divisive’ caste system (which is a social issue and prevalent everywhere) and other negatives like sati?

My conclusion is that the Church was afraid it would lose out when people come to know what Vedic knowledge really contains. They would stop blindly believing but go after genuine knowledge which is there in the Vedas.

That’s why they had to coin a new term and demean “Hinduism” in the eyes of common people right from the start. They were successful. Everywhere children learnt in schools about the ‘terrible caste system’ in Hinduism. People didn’t ask further. They *knew* now that Hinduism is greatly inferior to the two big religions.

Yet there is always the fear that people may discover that they were deceived for the sake of power and that truth may be different from what they were taught in religious class. In Germany, there is a saying which expresses certain folk wisdom:

The King says to the Pope: “You make sure that people stay stupid and I make sure they stay poor.”

By Maria Wirth


Read Full Post »

From: Pramod Agrawal < >

मुगलों के हरम की औलाद को हरामजादा कहा जाता है।


शाहजहाँ के हरम में ८००० रखैलें थीं जो उसे उसके पिता जहाँगीर से विरासत में मिली थी। उसने बाप की सम्पत्ति को और बढ़ाया। उसने हरम की महिलाओं की व्यापक छाँट की तथा बुढ़ियाओं को भगा कर और अन्य हिन्दू परिवारों से बलात लाकर हरम को बढ़ाता ही रहा।” (अकबर दी ग्रेट मुगल : वी स्मिथ, पृष्ठ ३५९)


कहते हैं कि उन्हीं भगायी गयी महिलाओं से दिल्ली का रेडलाइट एरिया जी.बी. रोड गुलजार हुआ था और वहाँ इस धंधे की शुरूआत हुई थी। जबरन अगवा की हुई हिन्दू महिलाओं की यौन-गुलामी और यौन व्यापार को शाहजहाँ प्रश्रय देता था, और अक्सर अपने मंत्रियों और सम्बन्धियों को पुरस्कार स्वरूप अनेकों हिन्दू महिलाओं को उपहार में दिया करता था।

यह नर पशु,यौनाचार के प्रति इतना आकर्षित और उत्साही था,कि हिन्दू महिलाओं का मीना बाजार लगाया करता था, यहाँ तक कि अपने महल में भी।


सुप्रसिद्ध यूरोपीय यात्री फ्रांकोइस बर्नियर ने इस विषय में टिप्पणी की थी कि, ”महल में बार-बार लगने वाले मीना बाजार,

जहाँ अगवा कर लाई हुई सैकड़ों हिन्दू महिलाओं का, क्रय-विक्रय हुआ करता था,राज्य द्वारा बड़ी संख्या में नाचने वाली लड़कियों की व्यवस्था,और नपुसंक बनाये गये सैकड़ों लड़कों की हरमों में उपस्थिती, शाहजहाँ की अनंत वासना के समाधान के लिए ही थी। (टे्रविल्स इन दी मुगल ऐम्पायर-फ्रान्कोइसबर्नियर :पुनः लिखित वी. स्मिथ, औक्सफोर्ड १९३४)


**शाहजहाँ को प्रेम की मिसाल के रूप पेश किया जाता रहा है और किया भी क्यों न जाए।


८००० औरतों को अपने हरम में रखने वाला अगर किसी एक में ज्यादा रुचि दिखाए तो वो उसका प्यार ही कहा जाएगा।आप यह जानकर हैरान हो जायेंगे कि मुमताज का नाम मुमताज महल था ही नहीं बल्कि उसका असली नाम “अर्जुमंद-बानो-बेगम” था। और तो और जिस शाहजहाँ और मुमताज के प्यार की इतनी डींगे हांकी जाती है वो शाहजहाँ की ना तो पहली पत्नी थी ना ही आखिरी । मुमताज शाहजहाँ की सात बीबियों में चौथी थी। इसका मतलब है कि शाहजहाँ ने मुमताज से पहले 3 शादियाँ कर रखी थी और,मुमताज से शादी करने के बाद भी उसका मन नहीं भरा तथा उसके बाद भी उस ने 3 शादियाँ और की यहाँ तक कि मुमताज के मरने के एक हफ्ते के अन्दर ही उसकी बहन फरजाना से शादी कर ली थी। जिसे उसने रखैल बना कर रखा हुआ था जिससे शादी करने से पहले ही शाहजहाँ को एक बेटा भी था।

अगर शाहजहाँ को मुमताज से इतना ही प्यार था तो मुमताज से शादी के बाद भी शाहजहाँ ने 3 और शादियाँ क्यों की….?????

अब आप यह भी जान लो कि शाहजहाँ की सातों बीबियों में सबसे सुन्दर मुमताज नहीं बल्कि इशरत बानो थी जो कि उसकी पहली पत्नी थी । उस से भी घिनौना तथ्य यह है कि शाहजहाँ से शादी करते समय मुमताज कोई कुंवारी लड़की

नहीं थी बल्कि वो शादीशुदा थी और,उसका पति शाहजहाँ की सेना में सूबेदार था जिसका नाम “शेर अफगान खान” था।शाहजहाँ ने शेर अफगान खान की हत्या कर मुमताज से शादी की थी। गौर करने लायक बात यह भी है कि ३८ वर्षीय

मुमताज की मौत कोई बीमारी या एक्सीडेंट से नहीं बल्कि चौदहवें बच्चे को जन्म देने के दौरान अत्यधिक कमजोरी के कारण हुई थी। यानी शाहजहाँ ने उसे बच्चे पैदा करने की मशीन ही नहीं बल्कि फैक्ट्री बनाकर मार डाला। **शाहजहाँ कामुकता के लिए इतना कुख्यात था कि कई इतिहासकारों ने उसे उसकी अपनी सगी बेटी जहाँआरा के साथ स्वयं सम्भोग करने का दोषी कहा है।


शाहजहाँ और मुमताज महल की बड़ी बेटी जहाँआरा बिल्कुल अपनी माँ की तरह लगती थी। इसीलिए मुमताज की मृत्यु के बाद उसकी याद में लम्पट शाहजहाँ ने अपनी ही बेटी जहाँआरा को फंसाकर भोगना शुरू कर दिया था। जहाँआरा को शाहजहाँ इतना प्यार करता था कि उसने उसका निकाह तक होने न दिया। बाप-बेटी के इस प्यार को देखकर जब महल में

चर्चा शुरू हुई,तो मुल्ला-मौलवियों की एक बैठक बुलाई गयी और उन्होंने इस पाप को जायज ठहराने के लिए एक हदीस का उद्धरण दिया और कहा कि – “माली को अपने द्वारा लगाये पेड़ का फल खाने का हक़ है”।

(Francois Bernier wrote, ” Shah Jahan used to have regular sex with his eldest daughter Jahan Ara. To defend himself,Shah Jahan used to say that, it was the privilege of a planter to taste the fruit of the tree he had planted.”)


**इतना ही नहीं जहाँआरा के किसी भी आशिक को वह उसके पास फटकने नहीं देता था। कहा जाता है की एकबार जहाँआरा जब अपने एक आशिक के साथ इश्क लड़ा रही थी तो शाहजहाँ आ गया जिससे डरकर वह हरम के तंदूर में छिप गया, शाहजहाँ नेतंदूर में आग लगवा दी और उसे जिन्दा जला दिया।


**दरअसल अकबर ने यह नियम बना दिया था कि मुगलिया खानदान की बेटियों की शादी नहीं होगी।

इतिहासकार इसके लिए कई कारण बताते हैं। इसका परिणाम यह होता था कि मुग़लखानदान की लड़कियां अपने जिस्मानी भूख मिटाने के लिए अवैध तरीके से दरबारी,नौकर के साथ साथ, रिश्तेदार यहाँ तक की सगे सम्बन्धियों का भी सहारा लेती थी।


**जहाँआरा अपने लम्पट बाप के लिए लड़कियाँ भी फंसाकर लाती थी। जहाँआरा की मदद से शाहजहाँ ने मुमताज के भाई शाइस्ता खान की बीबी से कई बार बलात्कार किया था।

**शाहजहाँ के राजज्योतिष की 13 वर्षीय ब्राह्मण लडकी को जहाँआरा ने अपने महल में बुलाकर धोखे से नशा करा बाप के हवाले कर दिया था जिससे शाहजहाँ ने 58 वें वर्ष में उस 13 बर्ष की ब्राह्मण कन्या से निकाह किया था। बाद में इसी ब्राहम्ण कन्या ने शाहजहाँ के कैद होने के बाद औरंगजेब से बचने और एक बार फिर से हवस की सामग्री बनने से खुद को बचाने के लिए अपने ही हाथों अपने चेहरे पर तेजाब डाल लिया था। **शाहजहाँ शेखी मारा करता था कि ‘ ‘वह तिमूर

(तैमूरलंग)का वंशज है जो भारत में तलवार और अग्नि लाया था। उस उजबेकिस्तान के जंगली जानवर तिमूर से और

उसकी हिन्दुओं के रक्तपात की उपलब्धि से इतना प्रभावित था कि उसने अपना नाम तिमूरद्वितीय रख लिया

(दी लीगेसी ऑफ मुस्लिम रूल इन इण्डिया-डॉ. के.एस. लाल, १९९२ पृष्ठ- १३२).


**बहुत प्रारम्भिक अवस्था से ही शाहजहाँ ने काफिरों (हिन्दुओं) के प्रति युद्ध के लिए साहस व रुचि दिखाई थी।

अलग-अलग इतिहासकारों ने लिखा था कि, ”शहजादे के रूप में ही शाहजहाँ ने फतेहपुर सीकरी पर अधिकार करलिया था और आगरा शहर में हिन्दुओं का भीषण नरसंहार किया था ।


**भारत यात्रा पर आये देला वैले,इटली के एक धनी व्यक्ति के अुनसार -शाहजहाँ की सेना ने भयानक बर्बरता का परिचय कराया था। हिन्दू नागरिकों को घोर यातनाओं द्वारा अपने संचित धन को दे देने के लिए विवश किया गया,और अनेकों

उच्च कुल की कुलीन हिन्दू महिलाओं का शील भंग किया गया।” (कीन्स हैण्ड बुक फौर विजिटर्स टू आगरा एण्ड

इट्सनेबरहुड, पृष्ठ २५)


**हमारे वामपंथी इतिहासकारों ने शाहजहाँ को एक महान निर्माता के रूप में चित्रित किया है। किन्तु इस मुजाहिद ने अनेकों कला के प्रतीक सुन्दर हिन्दू मन्दिरों और अनेकों हिन्दू भवन निर्माण कला के केन्द्रों का बड़ी लगन और जोश से विध्वंस किया था अब्दुल हमीद ने अपने इतिहास अभिलेख, ‘बादशाहनामामें लिखा था-महामहिम शहंशाह महोदय की सूचना में लाया गया कि हिन्दुओं के एक प्रमुख केन्द्र,बनारस में उनके अब्बा हुजूर के शासनकाल में अनेकों मन्दिरों के

पुनः निर्माण का काम प्रारम्भ हुआ था और काफिर हिन्दू अब उन्हें पूर्ण कर देने के निकट आ पहुँचे हैं।

इस्लाम पंथ के रक्षक,शहंशाह ने आदेश दिया कि बनारस में और उनके सारे राज्य में अन्यत्र सभी

स्थानों पर जिन मन्दिरों का निर्माण कार्य आरम्भ है, उन सभी का विध्वंस कर दिया जाए।


**इलाहाबाद प्रदेश से सूचना प्राप्त हो गई कि जिला बनारस के छिहत्तर मन्दिरों का ध्वंस कर दिया गया था।

(बादशाहनामा : अब्दुल हमीद लाहौरी, अनुवाद एलियट और डाउसन, खण्ड VII, पृष्ठ ३६)


**हिन्दू मंदिरों को अपवित्र करने और उन्हें ध्वस्त करनेकी प्रथा ने शाहजहाँ के काल में एक व्यवस्थित विकराल रूप धारण कर लिया था। (मध्यकालीन भारत – हरीश्चंद्र वर्मा – पेज-१४१)


*”कश्मीर से लौटते समय १६३२ में शाहजहाँ को बताया गया कि अनेकों मुस्लिम बनायी गयी महिलायें फिर से हिन्दू हो गईं हैं और उन्होंने हिन्दू परिवारों में शादी कर ली है। शहंशाह के आदेश पर इन सभी हिन्दुओं को बन्दी बना लिया गया।

प्रथम उन सभी पर इतना आर्थिक दण्ड थोपा गया कि उनमें से कोई भुगतान नहीं कर सका। तब इस्लाम स्वीकार कर लेने और मृत्यु में से एक को चुन लेने का विकल्प दिया गया। जिन्होनें धर्मान्तरण स्वीकार नहीं किया, उन सभी पुरूषों का सर काट दिया गया। लगभग चार हजार पाँच सौं महिलाओं को बलात् मुसलमान बना लिया गया और उन्हें सिपहसालारों, अफसरों और शहंशाह के नजदीकी लोगों और रिश्तेदारों के हरम में भेज दिया गया।” (हिस्ट्री एण्ड कल्चर ऑफ दी इण्डियन पीपुल : आर.सी. मजूमदार, भारतीय विद्या भवन,पृष्ठ३१२)


* १६५७ में शाहजहाँ बीमार पड़ा और उसी के बेटे औरंगजेब ने उसे उसकी रखैल जहाँआरा के साथ आगरा के किले में बंद कर दिया। परन्तु औरंगजेब मे एक आदर्श बेटे का भी फर्ज निभाया और अपने बाप की कामुकता को समझते हुए उसे अपने

साथ ४० रखैलें (शाही वेश्याएँ) रखने की इजाजत दे दी। दिल्ली आकर उसने बाप के हजारों रखैलों में से कुछ गिनी चुनी औरतों को अपने हरम में डालकर बाकी सभी को उसने किले से बाहर निकाल दिया। उन हजारों महिलाओं को भी दिल्ली के उसी हिस्से में पनाह मिली जिसे आज दिल्ली का रेड लाईट एरिया जीबी रोड कहा जाता है। जो उसके अब्बा शाहजहाँ की मेहरबानी से ही बसा और गुलजार हुआ था ।


***शाहजहाँ की मृत्यु आगरे के किले में ही २२ जनवरी १६६६ ईस्वी में ७४ साल की उम्र में द हिस्ट्री चैन शाहजहाँ की मृत्यु आगरे के किले में ही २२ जनवरी १६६६ ईस्वी में ७४ साल की उम्र में द हिस्ट्री चैनल के अनुसार अत्यधिक कमोत्तेजक दवाएँ खा लेने का कारण हुई थी। यानी जिन्दगी के आखिरी वक्त तक वो अय्याशी ही करता रहा था।

** अब आप खुद ही सोचें कि क्यों ऐसे बदचलन और दुश्चरित्र इंसान को प्यार की निशानी समझा कर महानबताया जाता है…… ????? क्या ऐसा बदचलन इंसान कभी किसी से प्यार कर सकता है….?????

क्या ऐसे वहशी और क्रूर व्यक्ति की अय्याशी की कसमेंखाकर लोग अपने प्यार को बे-इज्जत नही करते हैं ??


दरअसल ताजमहल और प्यार की कहानी इसीलिए गढ़ी गयी है कि लोगों को गुमराह किया जा सके और लोगों खास कर हिन्दुओं से छुपायी जा सके कि ताजमहल कोई प्यार की निशानी नहीं बल्कि महाराज जय सिंह द्वारा बनवाया गया भगवान् शिव का मंदिर””तेजो महालय”” है….! और जिसे प्रमाणित करने के लिए डा० सुब्रहमण्यम स्वामी आज भी सुप्रीम कोर्ट में सत्य की लड़ाई लड़ रहे हैं।


** असलियत में मुगल इस देश में धर्मान्तरण, लूट-खसोट और अय्याशी ही करते रहे परन्तु नेहरू के आदेश पर हमारे इतिहासकारों नें इन्हें जबरदस्ती महान बनाया। और ये सब हुआ झूठी धर्मनिरपेक्षता के नाम पर। #साभार_समाधान blogspot, ना जाने किस मुंह से सेकुलर कहते हैं कि हिन्दू मुस्लिम भाई भाई या ईश्वर अल्ला तेरो नाम?


सदा सर्वदा सुमंगल,

हर हर महादेव,

जय भवानी,

जय श्री राम.



Read Full Post »

Older Posts »