Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Islam’ Category

From: Santosh Varma < >

 

What the World Says About Islam

We have a choice, whether to hang together or be hanged separately.

-Human Rights Coalition against Radical Islam

 

“The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.” – Will Durant (U.S. Historian)

 

“Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralysis the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Muhammadanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.” – Sir Winston Churchill (British Prime Minister)

 

“Among religions, Bolshevism is to be reckoned with Muhammadanism rather than with Christianity and Buddhism, Christianity and Buddhism are primarily personal religions, with mystical doctrines and a love of contemplation. Muhammadanism and Bolshevism are practical, social, unspiritual (doctrines), concerned to win the empire of this world.” – Professor Bertrand Russell (Philosopher)

 

“Having thus given a cursory view of the Qur’an, I lay it before the sensible persons with the purpose that they should know what kind of book the Qur’an is. If they ask me, I have no hesitation to say that it cannot be the work either of God or of a learned man, nor can it be a book of knowledge. Here its very vital defect has been exposed with the object that the people may not waste their life falling into its imposition…… The Qur’an is the result of ignorance, the source of animalization of human being, a fruitful cause of destroying peace, an incentive to war, a propagator of hostility among men and a promoter of suffering in society. As to defect of repetition, the Qur’an is its store.”   Maharishi Swami Dayanand Saraswati (19th Century Indian Sage and Rational Reformer)

 

“Show me just what Prophet Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” – Pope Benedict/Byzantine Emperor Paleo Gus

 

“I studied the Kuran a great deal … I came away from that study with the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammed” – Alexis De Tocqville (French Thinker/Historian)

“Muslims are the first victims of Islam. Many times, I have observed in my travels that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain others in the practice of this religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him”. – Earnest Renan (French Thinker)

 

“How dreadful are the curses which Muhammadanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Muhammadan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.” – Sir Winston Churchill

 

———————————— –

 

There is more earnest interest in discovering the nature and potential of Islam than any other religion on earth. Scholars have spoken of it as war mongering ideology while the Muslims themselves call it a “religion of peace, a detailed guide for human life and conduct that covers every aspect of life.”

 

The Muslims are being watched with concern by every civilized, free and secular society where individual freedoms count. The fanaticism generated by its holy book, the Koran, inspired the “Believers” to spread by fire and sword from one end of the globe to the other. Ancient civilizations of northern Africa, Egypt, Syria, Persia, Afghanistan, India and Indonesia perished along its way. None except Europe could stand up to it and recover lost territory, driving it back from Spain, Austria and Greece, thus saving Christian religion and civilization from the marauders.

 

Zoroastrians in Persia, Buddhists in Afghanistan and Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh have perished, leaving no trace. Islam has the same goal, to Islamize the rest of the world but has changed tactics. Demography is its new weapon.

 

In the United Kingdom the Muslims, a separatist minority with hardcore of fundamentalist extremist terrorist elements, are gaining ground.

 

With loyalty to Global Islam they cannot be loyal citizens of Her Majesty’s Government but contenders for political power. Many Muslim countries are now bursting with surplus population and few resources to sustain it.

 

Islamic republics are badly governed under Draconian Sharia Law and myopic bigoted mullahs and imams who loathe secular education but add to discontent, revolts and bloodshed. Hence the scramble to escape to the relatively rich West. Their numbers are rising rapidly due to uncontrollable immigration and overproduction. Governments are suppressing facts on Islamic rise in numbers and the consequential threat

 

While other newcomers to the West like the Hindus and Sikhs, with small families, are dynamic, prosperous and mobile, the Muslims have other priorities, to multiply in numbers, dreaming of power sharing and eventually overpowering the secular and democratic forces.

 

CORE BELIEF OF MUSLIMS

 

Muslims are conditioned & brainwashed by three factors:

KORAN, the LIFE of Mohammed, and HADIS.

Koran is not a soothing calming holy spiritual book, preaching universal love and tolerance but is a Code of Conduct for the fighters of Islam (JEHAD). It is highly discriminatory against the non-Muslims using derogatory terms like “Kafir” (Infidel).

 

Mohammed spent most of his energy & time on Jihad (fighting) and women, not sparing even his own daughter-in-law. Muhammad had 23 wives and several of “HIS RIGHT HAND POSSESSED”- with right to have sex any time with them. Captured women were special target of his fighters besides loot and plunder.

 

The teachings of Islam have remained “frozen” since 7th century AD. None can alter even a comma in the Koran. Indoctrination is so crippling that no Muslim is prepared to utter the word “pig” at any time or tolerate seeing a Muslim female walking with a non-Muslim male. Leaving Islam means assassination. A girl making friends with a man without permission of her parents invites death by stoning or summary execution in public.

 

Muslims stand against most norms and customs of modern society, for example, multiculturalism, equality of sexes, monogamy, girls’ education, penal reform and humane treatment of criminals and dissidents.

 

British judicial & social systems evolved over centuries of bloodshed and trials. In contrast Islamic judicial and social systems have remained rigid due to suffocating stranglehold of Islam. Sharia Law is crude and cruel, being the same today that the barbarian Arab tribes needed to settle their disputes in 7th. century AD when men could not be trusted sitting beside women even in mosques. Muslims wish to live by it and also impose it on the others thus negating the struggles & sacrifices through which the Western (Christian) society has passed, paying heavy price. Muslims are, therefore, completely misfit and at odds in modern European society.

 

Muslims who initially came to the U.K. in early 1960’s were grateful to be allowed in and respected the laws of this society. They did not flaunt their religion either by beards or burka. But as their numbers grew, especially since early 1990’s, they have started assuming confrontational posture.

 

Living among the British people as equals they have shed the respect and awe of the former colonial masters but wish to Islamize Britain as they did to Western and Eastern India at Partition over the dead bodies of millions of non-Muslims.

 

To concede EQUALITY to those who are unable to appreciate it here and were unaccustomed to it back home is not only to ruin our social cohesion but also invite confrontation, strife and Jihad with the result that the Muslims have established their own schools, rules, broadcasting stations, print media, numerous mosques and even an Islamic Parliament. They are now a State within State and are demanding more and more resources, attention and (political) POWER. They are no more a well-integrated peaceful community in Great Britain but one that regards itself a part of global Islam, the 58th. (virtual) Islamic Republic, dreaming of living by Sharia Law here as in 56 other Islamic republics. From their perspective Church of England and Westminster are small obstacles in their way if not irrelevant. One spokesman, Anjem Chaudhry, has called for Buckingham Palace to be converted to an Islamic School or hospital, and Nelson’s Column to be destroyed like the Buddha Statues in Bamiyan, Afghanistan.

 

While most immigrants come to work and live in peace the Muslims have a separate agenda. So self-assured, they do not even conceal it. They wish to Islamize Britain by conquest, conversion or intimidation. If they succeed in their holy mission they will wreak great havoc and devastation upon this land and its people. One ought to see what happened to the non-Muslims in Pakistan during 1947. Within weeks the Muslims set fire to all the libraries, girls schools, churches, cinemas, public houses and even places of great historic value.

 

Among the 15 million, including the old, infirm and the infants, who could escape alive were the fleeing human rights champions, do-gooders, the honorable judges of high courts and members of the bar (the lawyers, advocates and barristers), doctors and nurses, businessmen, industrialists and shopkeepers, students, teachers and professors, prisoners, wardens and guards, the followers of Mahatma Gandhi, the Apostle of Peace, military and police officers, and all the SIKHS whose prayer contains the line, “Bless them all, O God.”

 

I am an eye witness, one of those survivors, a refugee in my own country when Islamic volcanic ASH covered land, towns, villages, farms, lakes, forests, hills and mountains. The “Hell” that was created by Islam was given the name, PAKISTAN. She is not worth returning to any more. Every free Briton is advised to go there now, taking along with him his old grandfather or grandmother who saw Lahore, Rawalpindi, Peshawar or Dhaka before 1947 and then come back and WARN everybody here.

Brainwashed Muslims, “high on the teachings of Koran”, are no different from the NAZIS in book burning, political assassinations and suppression of others’ freedoms. Islamic zealots in Egypt set fire to the grand library of Alexandria in 640 AD. Later Nalanda University in Afghanistan was destroyed. It was known as Dharma Gunj (Mountain of Truth) or Dharmagañja (Treasury of Truth) and was the most renowned repository of Buddhist knowledge in the world at the time. Its collection was said to comprise hundreds of thousands of volumes, so extensive that it burned for months when set aflame by Muslim invaders in 1193. In 2001 the Taliban happily destroyed the two historic Buddha statues that had stood there for a millennium and a half.

The reason why Muslims will not go away or go back to their own countries of origin is the fact that all Islamic republic’s crush individual liberties, ruining quality of life. They are politically and socially unstable, badly governed, corrupt and expect the women to live at home, serving men and raising numerous children.

 

Muslims have no concept of frontiers since Islam is global. Hence Muslims are willing to go and fight for Islam anywhere on earth. Their Oath of Loyalty to Crown is false since total submission to Koran is the highest virtue for them. Annual pilgrimage to Mecca renews and reinforces their allegiance to the highest authority in life called Allah.

 

Muslims threaten to overturn the demography in Europe and America by marrying more than one wife, by producing more children than the national norm and through active conversion. Their rapidly increasing presence and clout in politics and media are worrying.

 

Confining their own females indoors the Muslims seduce (abduct in Islamic countries!) non-Muslim girls to the grief of girls’ parents and families.

 

Marriage among Muslims is a contract, not a sacred commitment for life with the vow, “until death do us part.” They can marry and discard at convenience.

 

Most come to the west from lands where they have wiped out the non-Muslims who, in turn, look at the Muslims in the West with suspicion, trepidation and even fear. To them it is a surprise as to why the British do not share their deep concerns about the “time bomb” called ISLAM.

 

Muslims are impossible to engage in a civilized rational discussion since they are quick to fight, even assassinate.

 

Christians are not united nor committed to their religion like the Muslims. This is seen as weakness. Hence the appeasement of Muslims due to fear of annoying them. Documentation of Islamic barbarity in the rest of the world is not in public domain like the ideology and brutality of NAZIS who have “died” while the Muslims are “alive”, threatening us all.

 

Although their own record of multiculturalism in any Islamic Republic is abysmal they are quick to use England’s secular laws to their own advantage.

 

With Christians disunited and the Muslims claiming to be the fastest growing religion what will happen to Westminster and Crown when they eventually replace or capture them by sheer numbers?

 

Islam as a community is always at the bottom of economic pile due to suppression of females and over emphasis on learning Arabic in order to pray and understand Koran. Partition of India was war of the poor Muslims, once absolute rulers for centuries, against the prosperous Hindus.

 

Muslims aim for the highest, hoping for the rest to crumble automatically. That is why they launched attacks against the USA by destroying the WTC Towers in New York. Soon after that they attacked London and Madrid.

 

WAY OUT

 

As the time passes the specter of eventual Muslim take over looms large before our eyes. India is the prime example of this monumental neglect from which Europe is suffering right now. Unchecked by “political correctness” and liberal and tolerant attitude of people Islam grew to be a monster that “swallowed” five provinces overnight on August 15, 1947.

 

Tens of millions of non-Muslims living there for millennia perished or fled to Middle India for safety. It is too late now for India that was once UNITED. But there is still time for this country that can still call herself UNITED Kingdom. Right now, we see a new threat to her integrity and unity. It is ISLAM.

 

WHAT MUST WE DO?

 

  1. Raise awareness of people about Radical Islam.

 

  1. Ban the conversion of Christian girls on marrying a Muslim. Alternatively, make it mandatory for a Muslim groom to embrace the religion of his non-Muslim bride.

 

  1. Divorces among the Muslims must be closely scrutinized by courts. According to Islamic Law a man needs to say “divorce” three times, even over the phone or by SMS, and it becomes legal and official.

 

  1. Control the birth rate of Muslims. It should confirm to mainstream average, not excessive. No child allowance for those beyond two. (In China it is strictly one child per couple.)

 

  1. Ban on further Muslim immigration in view of forecast of Muslim numbers in future due to higher than normal birth rate of those already here.

 

  1. Data on Muslim population should be published once or twice every year since the Muslims, by belief, are separatist and anti-national.

 

  1. Each Muslim must swear the Oath of loyalty to Crown and accept British Law to override Islamic Sharia Law.

 

  1. On committing any crime, e.g., drug or human smuggling, there should be immediate deportation to his Islamic Republic where they deal with criminals fairly under Islamic Law. If we do not trust that Law to be human then we ought to raise our voice for abolition of every ISLAMIC republic on earth. We cannot let the Muslims living here gain both ways.

 

  1. Koran ought to be translated into the English language like the Bible. This will save too much time the young spend on learning the Arabic language at the cost of their school subjects.

 

  1. Teaching of ISLAM in schools should be done by Christian RE teachers,

 

  1. All Muslim charities, institutions and political and religious organizations should be under State supervision and control.

 

  1. Those murdering any girl on the pretext of “honor killing” ought to be sent back to country of origin. British tax payer should not pay to feed and keep them in jails for years.

 

  1. Non-Muslim girls should refuse to take lift with a Muslim male unless there is another female in the vehicle.

 

  1. A would be Muslim groom should take his future non-Muslim bride for a minimum of seven day stay in any Islamic Republic so that the girl knows what to expect in life as a Muslim’s wife.

 

======================

 

“A NATION GOES TO WAR AGAINST AN IDEOLOGY. We are confronting something that is totalitarian, theocratic & political. It is ISLAM. It is not about Muslims just as not every German was a NAZI.”

 

CONCLUSION

 

Future of England is in danger. A thousand years ago the brave crusaders pushed the Muslim invaders back. Today we do not see the same zeal and unity in Europe to push the infiltrators back, in order to make it “MUSLIM FREE” part of the world. It will be nothing preposterous in the face of the preposterous enemy when we see CHRISTIAN FREE ARABIA, BUDDHIST FREE AFGHANISTAN and HINDU FREE PAKISTAN.

 

In order to ensure peace and prosperity we must ask the Muslims to delete the word “KAFIR” (Infidel) from their Koran. At present most imams and preachers of hate call Her Majesty “Kafir” and advise young men not to wear uniform of the army. We can also follow the example of China where travel to Vatican for pilgrimage is banned.

 

We ought to be clear on one thing. If it is not possible for us to do so then Islam will overwhelm the KAFIRS in the United Kingdom, too, sooner or later.

 

A nation goes to war against an Ideology. We are against something that is totalitarian, theocratic, political Ideology and it is called ISLAM. It is safely and silently creeping through our foundations by deceit, fraud and surprise attack whenever and wherever an opportunity becomes available. Islam is no respecter of (English) Law, (human) Life and (multi) Culture.

 

If we encourage, or let, Islam grow it will spread like cancer through this land due to appeasement or cowardice. British landscape will resemble that of Afghanistan and Waziristan. The natives of these Isles will be fleeing for safety in all directions like the Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and the Somalis. All the constitutional scholars legal experts and the vocal champions of Burka and Minarets will be the first to have their throats cut. How many of them are seen in ISLAMIC lands?

 

FINALLY

February 24, 2010 — Allen West, retired Colonel and commander in Iraq gave a lucid, straight forward and important speech in Washington D.C. Feb 19 2010 at an event organized by Pamela Geller among others. The speech was on the threat Islam poses to United States and rest of the World. Watch it and be warned of future if nothing is done right now:

 

Click >> Colonel Allen West Answers a Marine’s Question

********

An Article by Maria Wirth

https://mariawirthblog.wordpress.com/about/

 

Though I have lived in India for a long time, there are still issues here that I find hard to understand. For example, why do so many educated Indians become agitated when India is referred to as a Hindu country? The majority of Indians are Hindus. India is special because of its ancient Hindu tradition. Westerners are drawn to India because of Hinduism. Why then is there this resistance by many Indians to acknowledge the Hindu roots of their country? Why do some people even give the impression that an India which valued those roots would be dangerous? Don’t they know better?

 

This attitude is strange for two reasons. First, those educated Indians seem to have a problem only with “Hindu” India, but not with “Muslim” or “Christian” countries. Germany, for example, is a secular country, and only 59 percent of the population are registered with the two big Christian churches (Protestant and Catholic). Nevertheless, the country is bracketed under “Christian countries” and no one objects. Angela Merkel, the Chancellor, stressed recently the Christian roots of Germany and urged the population “to go back to Christian values.” In 2012 she postponed her trip to the G-8 summit to make a public address on Katholikentag, “Catholics Day.” Two major political parties carry Christian in their name, including Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union.

 

Germans are not agitated that Germany is called a Christian country, though I actually would understand if they were. After all, the history of the

Church is appalling. The so-called success story of Christianity depended greatly on tyranny. “Convert or die” were the options given—not only some five hundred years ago to the indigenous population in America, but also in Germany, 1,200 years ago, when the emperor Karl the Great ordered the death sentence for refusal of baptism in his newly conquered realms. This provoked his advisor Alkuin to comment: “One can force them to baptism, but how to force them to believe?”

 

Those times, when one’s life was in danger for dissenting with the dogmas of Christianity, are thankfully over. Today many in the West do dissent and are leaving the Church in a steady stream. They are disgusted with the less-than-holy behavior of Church officials and they also can’t believe in the dogmas, for example that “Jesus is the only way” and that God sends all those who don’t accept this to hell.

 

The second reason why I can’t understand the resistance to associate India with Hinduism is that Hinduism is in a different category from the Abrahamic religions. Its history, compared to Christianity and Islam, was undoubtedly the least violent as it spread in ancient times by convincing arguments and not by force. It is not a belief system that demands blind acceptance of dogmas and the suspension of one’s intelligence. On the contrary, Hinduism encourages using one’s intelligence to the hilt. It is an enquiry into truth based on a refined character and intellect. It comprises a huge body of ancient literature, not only regarding dharma and philosophy, but also regarding music, architecture, dance, science, astronomy, economics, politics, etc. If Germany or any other Western country had this kind of literary treasure, it would be so proud and highlight its greatness on every occasion. When I discovered the Upanishads, for example, I was stunned. Here was expressed in clear terms what I intuitively had felt to be true, but could not have expressed clearly. Brahman is not partial; it is the invisible, indivisible essence in everything. Everyone gets again and again a chance to discover the ultimate truth and is free to choose his way back to it. Helpful hints are given but not imposed.

 

In my early days in India I thought every Indian knew and valued his tradition. Slowly I realized I was wrong. The British colonial masters had

been successful in not only weaning away many of the elite from their ancient tradition but even making them despise it. It helped that the

British-educated class could no longer read the original Sanskrit texts and believed what the British told them. This lack of knowledge and the

brainwashing by the British education may be the reason why many so-called “modern” Indians are against anything Hindu. They don’t realize the

difference between Western religions that have to be believed (or at least professed) blindly, and which discourage, if not forbid, their adherents to think on their own, and the multi-layered Hindu Dharma which gives freedom and encourages using one’s intelligence.

 

Many of the Indian educated class do not realize that those who dream of imposing Christianity or Islam on this vast country will applaud them for

denigrating Hindu Dharma, because this creates a vacuum where Western ideas can easier gain a foothold. At the same time, many Westerners, including staunch Christians, know the value of Hindu culture and surreptitiously appropriate insights from the vast Indian knowledge system, drop the original Hindu source and present it either as their own or make it look as if these insights had already been known in the West. As the West appropriates valuable and exclusive Hindu assets, what it leaves behind is deemed inferior. Unwittingly, these Indians are helping what Rajiv Malhotra of Infinity Foundation calls the digestion of Dharma civilization into Western universalism. That which is being digested, a deer for example, in this case Hindu Dharma, disappears whereas the digester (a tiger) becomes stronger.

 

If only missionaries denigrated Hindu Dharma, it would not be so bad, as they clearly have an agenda which discerning Indians would detect. But sadly, Indians with Hindu names assist them because they wrongly believe Hinduism is inferior to Western religions. They belittle everything Hindu instead of getting thorough knowledge. As a rule, they know little about their tradition except what the British have told them, i.e., that the major features are the caste system and idol worship. They don’t realize that India would gain, not lose, if it solidly backed its profound and all-inclusive Hindu tradition.

 

When will the Westernized Indian elite realize it?

****** By Rick Mathis

(Rick Mathis, is a well-known leader in prison ministry)

The Muslim religion is the fastest growing religion per capita in the United States, especially in the minority races!!!

 

Last month I attended my annual training session that’s required for maintaining my state prison security clearance. During the training session there was a presentation by three speakers representing the

Roman Catholic, Protestant, and Muslim faiths, who explained each of their beliefs.

 

I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say.

The Imam gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video.

 

After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers.

 

When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Imam and asked:

‘Please, correct me if I’m wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that’s the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?’

 

There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, ‘Non-believers!’

 

I responded, ‘So, let me make sure I have this straight. All

followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?’

 

The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar.’

 

He sheepishly replied, ‘Yes.’

 

I then stated, ‘Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine Pope John Paul commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith, or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!’

 

The Imam was speechless!

 

I continued, ‘I also have a problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me!

 

Let me ask you a question: Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?’

 

You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam hung his head in shame.

*******

50 Biggest Enemies of Hindus (Dead Or Alive) — By François Gautier

50 biggest enemies of Hindus

— By Francois Gautier

Hindus should at least know who are their enemies. Jews have shown us that to remember, helps to make sure that atrocities do not happen again. Let us not forget that the biggest genocide ever – is that of the Hindus – which has been calculated at 100 million victims, from the Hindu Kush to the Mumbai attacks of 2006.

This list, which is compiled without any hatred or malice, is not complete. I am counting on you to raise it to a hundred. If you think I missed someone, Facebook it to me, with the name and two or three paragraphs on why you think he or she is an enemy of the Hindus.

It would be also interesting to compile separately a list of say, the ten or twenty biggest enemies of Hindus in the US (or UK, or Canada) that could be circulated worldwide and damper the activities of these people….

I have also made a hit parade of the ten countries that I feel are inimical to Hindus.

HERE THE LIST:

1) Thomas Babington Macaulay – He played a significant role in introducing English and western concepts to education in India. This was worthy as no one can deny that English gives India an edge in dealing with other countries to penetrate into the era of globalization. Yet, Macaulay had very little regard for Hindu culture and education including all the books written in Sanskrit which actually contains all the historical information. Rather, the worthless abridgement used at preparatory schools in England is considered more valuable than books written in Sanskrit language. Today, much of India’s intellectuals and Media stand as a proof of the success of Macaulay as they look down on their own culture and analyses India through the western prism.

2) Indian National Congress – Only a few people know that the Indian National Congress was founded on 28 December 1885 by a Britisher, A.O. Hume. Its objectives were to “allow all those who work for the national (read British) good to meet each other personally, to discuss and decide of the political operations to start during the year”. And certainly, till the end of the 19th century, the Congress, who regarded British rule in India as a “divine dispensation”, was pleased with criticizing moderately the Government, while endorsing its loyalty to the Crown and its faith in “liberalism” and “the British innate sense of justice”! The real nationalist leaders like Sri Aurobindo and Tilak, were put aside by the “moderate Congress”.

3) Jawaharlal Nehru – A French historian Alain Danielou writes, “Nehru was the perfect replica of a certain type of Englishman.” Several times he used the expression ‘continental people’, with an amused and sarcastic manner, to designate French or Italians. He reviled non-anglicized Indians and had a very shallow and partial knowledge of India. His ideal, the romantic socialism of 19th century Britain, was totally unfit to India, as the conditions of India were totally different from 19th century Europe. Nehru has been promoted by Congress as an icon, which nobody has yet dared to touch, but as history will show more and more, Nehru had done tremendous harm to India by initiating movements and patterns, which not only did vast damage in their times, but continue to survive and weigh down the Indian nation, long after their uselessness has been realized.

4) Babur – Jawaharlal Nehru wrote about Babur mentioning him as the destroyer of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The truth is that Babur indulged in unnecessary massacres and demolished thousands of temples showcasing himself as a ferocious Mughal emperor. His ultimate goal was probably the destruction and the enslaving of the Hindus. It is sad to see that Indian history books have no comments on such incidents.

5) Sonia Gandhi – It is true that Sonia brought discipline, order and consistency into the Congress party. But the amount of unrestrained power that she, a non-Indian, a simple elected MP like hundreds of others, possessed when the Congress was in power for ten years, should frighten us: a word, indeed a glance of her was sufficient to trigger action by her entourage, using any means—bearing in mind the case of P. Chidambaram when he would have allowed Narendra Modi to be killed by a Ishrat Jahan, a known terrorist. Thus, the instruments of power had never been so perverted in India. The CBI allegedly suppressed all orders against Quattrocchi and even allowed him to get away with billions of rupees which he had stolen from India. Yet, without blinking an eyelid, and with the Indian Media turning a blind eye, it went ruthlessly after Narendra Modi, the then chief minister of the most efficiently run state, the most corruption free.

6) The Pope – Christianity, unfortunately, is still clinging in the belief of a single true God, Jesus Christ, in spite of the feeble attempts at “Ecumenism” of the Church. It would be all right if the Church was playing by the rules of the free market, where there is a certain amount of fairness— “you see what advantages my religion is bringing you, compare it with your own and then feel free to choose”. But, sadly, the missionaries are using indirect and persuasive means to convert the poorest of the poor Hindus in India—offering free medical treatment, free schooling, interest-free loans, even going as far as organizing “fake miracle” prayer meetings, as it is regularly done by American preacher Benny Hinn. This is practiced in India, but they dare not do it in China, where freedom of religion is curtailed and any missionary caught persuading is kicked out. Would Hindus dare convert Christians in France, for instance? The confounding fact is that there is not a single Hindu temple in France, as their construction has not been allowed and there is even a minister in charge of hunting down “sects” (meaning what is not Christian-oriented).

7) Rahul Gandhi – No doubt Rahul Gandhi is a decent, well-meaning man, though totally ignorant of India’s culture and spirituality. But his ignorance becomes problematic as times. Bearing in mind the case of Wikileaks cables, where Rahul Gandhi tells the American ambassador that Hindu terrorism was more dangerous than Islamic terrorism— “The bigger threat may be the growth of radicalized Hindu groups, which create religious tensions and political confrontations with the Muslim community”. It looks like Rahul and his mother were trying to make an example of Colonel Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya to gratify their Muslim electorate by issuing direct orders to get a confession out of him and Sadhvi Pragya at any cost, even torture.

8) The Communist Party of India – Very few people know that the communists refused to collaborate against the Nazis during the 2nd World War, because Russia was then allied with Germany. Their attitude during the war with China in 1962 was also very uncertain. Most Marxists in India are anti-Hindu as a principle (Marx was against religion) and their intellectuals are expert at criticizing Hindus. At a time when Marxism is deceased all over the world, including in Cuba and China, India is the last haven of communism. Though communists have certain sincerity (they generally are not corrupt and live a simple life, contrary to many Indian politicians) but they contribute very little to India’s growth, with their constant strikes and demands. Naxalism which is a great threat to this country is also a sprout of communism.

9) Priyanka Gandhi – We all can assume that in case Sonia Gandhi leaves India or something happens to her, Priyanka—and not Rahul—will be the natural choice of the Congress to take up the wheels. Would Priyanka bring a change in Congress? Unlikely. She will think like a Christian and a westerner, not like an Indian and adopt Nehru’s misplaced socialist and popular idea’s, which have landed India in corruption and red tape. Also, her husband Robert Vadra, a man who multiplied his wealth by 600 times in five years, is an albatross around her neck.

10) Barkha Dutt – Married twice to a Kashmiri Muslim, from a young journalist, Barkha turned into a Hindu basher (you just have to listen to the Radia tapes to understand that). The power that came with NDTV, as it grew into the most sophisticated TV news channel, and her proximity to the Congress party, also influenced her mind. There are also accusations of corruption against her and her boss Prannoy Roy.

[Message clipped] View entire message

 

 

 

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

On Islam to ISIS

From: Ronnie Mendonca < >

On Islam to ISIS

 

Dear ISIS,

 

I have been trying desperately to find ways in which your shocking behavior offends your own ‘religion of peace’ – but given all that you have done, and all that I have read in the Qur’an and the biographies of Muhammad, I cannot.

 

Your appalling actions are in accurate accordance with both your scripture and the exemplary example set by the perfect Muslim, Muhammad.  I’d like to say that severing the hands of thieves is a gross violation of your “peaceful” religious codes of conduct, but it isn’t (Qur’an 5:38-39, Sahih al-Bukhari 8:6789 & Sahih al-Muslim 3:4175-79).

 

I would have loved to have picked up the Qur’an and hadith and found passages therein that expressly forbade the raping of Muslim and non-Muslim women, but alas, I found that here again you were acting in strict concordance with your scripture (Qur’an 2:223, 4:3, 23:5-6 & Sahih al-Bukhari 1:367 & 5:522).

 

It would have made my day to read that no Muslim is allowed to cunningly and greedily extort non-Muslims for protection money in similitude to a criminal syndicate, however, once again, I found the opposite to be true (‘Jizya’: Qur’an 9:29, Sahih al-Muslim 19:4294).

 

To my utter dismay, I scanned the entire corpus of your most reliable Quranic commentaries and compared the teachings expounded upon therein to the atrocities you have committed, from driving out non-Muslims from Muslim lands (Sahih al-Muslim 19:4366 & Sahih al-Bukhari 3:531), the murdering of infidels (Qur’an 2:191), to the violent jihad you have undertaken (Qur’an 4:94 & Sahih al-Bukhari 2:1:35, etc., etc.,) – yet, each and every atrocious act you have enjoyed can be credited to the Quran and your religion’s most admired man, Muhammad.

 

For a brief moment I found relief in the more peaceful Meccan chapters and verses of the Qur’an, but such relief was rudely interrupted by the revelation that those chapters and verses have been abrogated by a tradition you refer to as ‘Na’skh’ (Qur’an 2:106 & 16:101) – and that the majority opinion amongst Islamic scholars on the matter dictates that the violent Medinan verses have nullified the more peaceful Meccan ones.

 

I read through the Sahih (most reliable) hadiths hoping to find a way in which I could turn your religion against you, but all I found was a wellspring of scriptural justification. Muhammad raped (teenage) female prisoners of war (Sahih al-Bukhari 1:367 & 5:522), he ordered the beheading of non-Muslims and those who criticized him (Ishaq: 675), and his ambitions, as were revealed to me by a careful reading of your sacred scripture, perfectly aligned with your own.

 

Given all I have found, I must regretfully concede that you are practicing your religion correctly.  In light of this concession, I no longer assign all of the blame to your violent and heinous organization – instead, I now reserve a large chunk of that blame for the religion which has provided you with your maniacal manifesto.

 

Sincerely,

 

Michael A. Sherlock

P.S. If you’d like to read more, click the link – ISIS Is Islam – Dawkins Foundation

(Comment: Islam provides no freedom of thought, speech and action. It kills all the human intelligence and characteristics from humans. – Skanda987@gmail.com; https://www.skanda987.wordpress.com )

 

Read Full Post »

The Dark Side of Sufism

From: Devinder Gulati < >

An essay showing the dark side of Sufism as practiced throughout history and why we must not uncritically swallo…

Contrary to the spiritual mission of Sufism, the cult was primarily introduced in India for spread of Islam with a view to help the Muslim rulers for political domination. By and large the spiritual successors of mystic Islamic saints enjoyed the royal favour of Muslim rulers and gave moral support to the atrocious Muslim invaders and looked other way to ignore the growing social conflict. They also guided the State in political affairs with their experience of regular interaction with common people.

The mission of Shaikh Sirhindi popularly know as Mujaddid was to purify Islam from the influence of Akbar with a view to counter his policy of “the Hindu wielding the sword of Islam” and “Peace with all”. Unhappy with the regime of Emperor Akbar for withdrawal of Jejia tax imposed on the Hindus, Sirhindi made hectic effort to purge Islam of all extraneous influences. He viewed Hindu mystics like Guru Nanak and Sant Kabir contemptible, as they did not follow Sharia.

With contempt against old schools of mysticism for tolerance, Sirhindi condemned the reign of Akbar for his ‘broadmindedness’ and policy of ‘peace with all’. Propagating against the contemporary socio-cultural situation Sirhindi, felt that the attitude of Akbar “sullied the purity of Islam and the political social and cultural life of Muslims” (History of Sufism in India by Saiyied Athar Abbas Rizvi, Volume 2, 1992, Page Page 212). During the closing years of Akbar reign, when his son Salim had revolted against him, Sirhindi spread the virus of communalism with some success “in the beginning of Jehangir’s reign”. He strongly criticised freedom of worship granted to the Hindus.  Hate-Hindu syndrome was so deep in him that “death of Akbar (1605) filled Shaikh Ahmad with hopes that the pristine purity of Islam would be implanted in India” (Sufism in India by Saiyied Athar Abbas Rizvi, Volume 2, 1992, Page 204). “Misguided and greedy Ulama, he (Sirhindi) believed, were responsible for the alleged downfall of Islam in Akbar’s regime” (Ibid. Page 365.)

With his strong contempt against Shia and the Hindus, Sirhind wrote several letters to the nobles in the court of Jehangir for guiding the emperor on the path of Shariat, and for removal of Qafirs (Shias and Hindus) from the administration. He was dead against any honourable status of Hindus in Islamic government. Sirhind wanted the religious freedom enjoyed by the Hindus during Akbar regime to be curbed. Enraged with his too much interference in administration, Jehangir imprisoned him in Gwalier (A History of Sufism in India by Saiyid Athar Abbas Rizvi, Vol. II, 1972, Page 178) but released him after one year. Sirhind not only “injected communal virus into the body politic of the country but also generated hatred, mutual distrust and discord among the various sections of Muslims”(Ibid. page XII). Despite this anti-Hindu tirade of Sirhindi, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad in 1919 eulogiged the role of Mujaddid (Sirhind),”who did not see eye to eye with the policy of state” (Ibid. Page215)
Iqbal was a known follower of Islamic mysticism of Qadiriyya order. He, synthesied the mystic ideology of Wali Ullah and the modern view on Islam of Sir Sayed Ahmad Khan and made his Islamic mystic approach completely subservient to political domination of the Muslims. Applying modern philosophy in his intellectual exploration of Sufism he gradually turned to an anti-Sufi philosopher. He said, “The present day Muslims prefer to roam about aimlessly in the dusty valleys of Hellenic -Persiam mysticism, which teaches us to shut our eyes to the hard reality around, and to fix our gaze on what it describes as ‘Illuminations’ a blue, red and yellow reality springing up from the cells of an overworked brain” (Sufis and anti-Sufis by Elizabeth Syrrieh, 1999). “Sufi shaikhs constituting a spiritual aristocracy, Iqbal appealed to Muslim youth to cast off the Sufi noose from their neck” (Ibid. Page133). For Iqbal Sufism was a formulation of Islamic Persianism. It was contrary to the purity of Arabic faith in its original version. His rejection of Sufism was influenced by Wahhabi movement of Saudi Arabia, which was more concerned with Islamic power following the decline of Muslim power in eighteenth century.
SUFISM IN INDIA: Its origin, history and politics. | South Asia Analysis Group
 

Read Full Post »

Rohingya Refugees – A Real National Security Threat

For Hindustan

By Gb Reddy < >

Rohingya refugee exodus from Myanmar and their illegal immigration into India through Bangladesh is ongoing and real. A Chinese source stated “It’s fair to say that Myanmar is a heaven for saints who rebel and a graveyard for those who govern.” At Monk’s behest, military crackdown is real.

Be that as it may, Rohingya refugee is certainly India’s emerging national security threat concern. De facto, India’s demographic equilibrium already stands upset during the past 70 years due to faulty Congress Party vote bank appeasement politics. From 8.9% Muslims as per 1951 census, officially at over 14% in 2011 and unofficially around 20% as per Owaisi brothers of Hyderabad, Telangana.

The Muslim firebrand leaders like Asaduddin Owaisi and his brother Akbaruddin, Badarruddin Ajmal, Azam Khan, UP, Zakir Nayik, Mumbai, Shahi Imam’s of Tippu Sultan Mosque, Kolkata and Delhi, among many others have been pouring jingoistic rhetoric against the Hindus.

For example, Asaduddin Owaisi as per media stated “Hindus shouldn’t make the mistake of considering Indian-Muslims any different from the Pakistan-Muslims. If India may dare to attack Pakistan, then 25 crore Indian-Muslims will join Pakistan Forces and fight against India. And, he talks of compassion to be shown to Rohingya Muslim refugees.

So also, Maulana Badarruddin Ajmal, AIUDF, Assam stated “Hindus do not have any rights to vote in Arab, Pakistan or anyone of the 56 Islamic Nations. I challenge: has even a single Hindu the strength (guts) to impose restrictions on our voting rights in India?”

Khaleda Zia, Bangladesh National Party stated “I regret the continuing massacre of Hindus and Buddhists in Bangladesh, but Bangladesh is an Islamic Nation and not Secular. Under the circumstances, if Hindus and Buddhists want to live safely, they should either convert to Islam or go to India.”

Let me highlight the growth of Muslim population in West Bengal and Assam. From 19.85% as per 1951 Census, Muslim population in West Bengal has grown to 28% as per 2011 Census with decadal growth continuing above 21%. Mamata Banerjee has earned the dubious “Mamata Begum” distinction.

Ipso facto, the most rapid rise of Muslims is in Assam. Illegal immigration – demographic invasion – from Bangladesh is squarely responsible for the sharp rise in the Muslim population of Assam. From 17.62% as per 1951 Census, Muslim population has surged to 29.59% as per 2011 Census. From NIL Muslim-majority districts in 1951, the number had increased to 6 in 2001 and 9 in 2011.

Disturbing is the transformation in Assam as per 2011 Census: Dhubri 79.67%; Goalpara 57.52%; Nagaon 55.36%; Barpeta 70.74%; Morigaon 52.56%; Karimganj 56.36%; Hailakandi 60.31%; Bongaigaon 50.22%; and Darrang 64.34%. Other districts with a significant share of Muslims are Cachar 37.71%, Kamrup 39.66% and Nalbari 35.96%. Is Assam soon going to be a Muslim majority State by 2050 if rapid demographic transition allowed on natural growth and illegal immigration processes?

Most important it is also to note transformation of 3 neighboring districts In West Bengal from minority in 1947 to majority status (2011 Census): Mushiradabad with 66.27%; Maldah with 51.27%; Uttar Dinajpur with 49.92%; and South 24 Parganas and Birbhum following behind with over 35%.

If the Rohingya refugees are allowed to enter on humanitarian consideration, there would be dramatic transformation in both West Bengal and Assam paving the way for separation of the North East from the rest of mainland. Let Mani Shankar Iyer, Prashant Bhusan and ilk suffer from no illusions.

Be that as it may, let me provide a perspective of the Rohingya refugee crisis. The provocations as per Myanmar military are the attacks by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA), Muslim insurgents or terrorist group aided by Islamist radicals, fatal attacks on 30 police outposts on August 25. Even in 2015, ARSA had launched attacks on several border posts along the border with Bangladesh.

Before Aug. 25, 2017, Associated Press, Dhaka-Bangladesh, reported some 500,000 Rohingya’s had arrived after bloody anti-Muslim rioting in 2012 or amid earlier persecution drives in Myanmar. After the crackdown after 25th August 2017, at least 370,000 Rohingya have flooded into Bangladesh. Ethnic cleansing is almost complete – over 870,000 refugees out of total 1,000,000 Rohingya’s.

Most of the refugees are located along the Teknaf-Cox’s Bazar highway that is parallel to the Naf River, which is the border between Bangladesh and Myanmar.

In pre 2012 exodus, illegal Rohingya influx has taken place into West Bengal. And, some of them have been sent to Jammu, whilst unknown numbers have moved into interior locations like Hyderabad and given ration cards and identity papers by Muslim brethren purportedly reflecting compassion. And, the justification given is “if normalcy returns, they would definitely prefer to go back to our homeland.” However, there are very few examples of return of refugee to their native lands.

Two charities, the Zakat Foundation of India (ZFI) and Don Bosco, have been working to help the Rohingya in New Delhi. Zafar Mahmood, the president of ZFI, says 210 Rohingya are living in Madanpur Khadar on land provided by his organization. “We are hosting them because it is our moral and religious duty,” Mahmood explains. Khalsa Aid is providing ‘free lungar” to refugees in Bangladesh.

Now, human rights activists and so called libertarians not only from India and also from all other parts of the world are shouting hoarsely against India for not admitting Rohingya refugees into India and recent plan to deport nearly 40,000 refugees of the past.

Two human rights groups have accused the U.N. Security Council of ignoring the crisis. Louis Charbonneau, the U.N. director for Human Rights Watch, said, “This is an international peace and security crisis” and there is no excuse for the Security Council “sitting on its hands.” Also, the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, criticized India: “India cannot carry out collective expulsions, or return people to a place where they risk torture or other serious violations.”

In response, Permanent Representative of India to UN in Geneva Rajiv K Chander said, “We are perplexed at some of the observations made by the High Commissioner in his oral update. “Like many other nations, India is concerned about illegal migrants, in particular, with the possibility that they could pose security challenges. Enforcing the laws should not be mistaken for lack of compassion,” he said.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the world’s largest Muslim body, is urging Myanmar to allow U.N. monitors so they can investigate what it alleges is systematic brutality against the Rohingya. Instead of crying foul and hoarse, why is it the OIC Muslim community of 57 nations welcome their Muslim brother refugees to their fold until the UN finds a solution to the crisis?

Islamic radical terrorism threat is real particularly in those countries with sizeable Muslim population. None should forget that Saudi Arabia had long been a financial backer of the Taliban and, together with Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), officially recognized the group when it assumed control of Afghanistan in 1996. Now, they blame Qatar for supporting the Taliban. And, Iran too is extending support to Islamist fundamentalists. The Saudi break with the Taliban is the increasing support the Taliban have accepted from Iran. The Sunni-Shia conflict is also real.

Over the last decade, there has also been a shift in Saudi funding to Pakistan away from Deobandi groups like the Taliban to the more extreme Ahl-i-Hadith sect, the Pakistani equivalent of Wahhabism. Local sources in Pakistan have reported that Saudi Arabia is providing funding for Jihadi training camps in order to launch attacks on Iran from Baluchistan.

If the OIC nations, particularly the ‘Rich’ ones flush with petro dollars could extend financial aid to Islamist fundamentalist’s world over, but fail to provide relief and rehabilitation to their Muslim brethren, they have no right to criticize other nations refusing to accept Rohingya refugees and bear economic burden despite millions of BPL families. In particular, as a cautionary policy and strategy to pre-empt spread of Islamist radicalism already manifesting in various forms.

Instead, they can surely financially aid the refugees. Moreover, such Muslim countries can allow entry of Rohingya’s into their own land and provide relief. Saudi Arabia and Iran can surely admit over 500,000 Rohingya refugees, besides Indonesia and Malaysia thereby relieve the burden of Bangladesh.

Add to them, even other nations like China, Russia, USA, Canada, Australia and other advanced nations of the world, three times larger geographically than India with very low populations and abundant natural resources must voluntarily opt to admit the Rohingya refugees into their own sparsely populated provinces.

India would allow free air transportation refugees to such benevolent nations at its own cost directly from Bangladesh.

Rights activists, like Delhi based Apoorvanand Jha, have criticized the government over a controversial citizenship law that includes a provision for welcoming refugees facing persecution, specifying “Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan”, but notably excludes Muslims.

In a recent blog, Mani Shankar Aiyer, a former cabinet minister and member of the opposition Congress party, accused the Modi government of ending India’s “golden tradition” of opening its doors to refugees. “… if we can assure indefinite refuge to uncounted generations of Tibetans, unnumbered Afghans and hundreds of thousands of Sri Lankan Tamils refugees, why not a few thousand Rohingya?” he wrote.

In retrospect, the Congress Party is squarely responsible and accountable for the rapid demographic transitions sweeping various districts of West Bengal and Assam. They failed dismally to ensure the return of Bangladeshi refugees of 1971 war. And sadly, they used them as ‘vote bank’ tools.

Quite absurd it is that 24-year-old Rohingya Mohammad Shakil has challenged the government’s plan to deport them in the Supreme Court – “We would prefer to die here [in India] than return.”

Prashant Bhusan is appearing in the petition in India’s Supreme Court: the deportation would violate Article 14 (the Right to Equality) and Article 21 (the Right to Life) of the Constitution of India. It adds that India is a signatory to various conventions that recognize the principle of “non-refoulement”, which prohibits forcing refugees to return to places where their lives might be at risk. Bhusan stated that these refugees cannot be sent back to Myanmar till their life and liberty would be assured there.

Kiren Rijiju in 2015 said that all Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Christian refugees are welcome in India. Now for Rohingya’s, he is saying that they will have to be deported. This is in tune with this government’s communal policy and communal actions. India is not a signatory of UN Refugee Convention. Yet, it is binding on India to admit them even at the cost of livelihood to their own people.

Last week Modi visited Myanmar – his second visit in three years – and held talks with Aung San Suu Kyi. There was no reference to Rohingya issue in the joint statement. After all, India has significant geopolitical and security interests that continue to shape its outreach to Myanmar as part of its “Act East” policy. In 2016, India built a port in Sittwe, the capital of Rakhine State. It is currently constructing a highway that will connect Moreh in India with Mae Sot in Thailand via Myanmar. And it has plans to further boost military and economic cooperation with the country, to which it sells a wide range of defense equipment. In July 2017, the commander-in-chief of Myanmar’s armed forces visited India.

In sum, there is no simple solution to the Rohingya crisis. The UN has no effective mechanisms for solving these ethnic crises. There is no love for the Rohingya among the Islamic community of Nations or its neighboring powers: India, China, and Thailand.

India’s national security strategic interests should outweigh all other considerations. Viewed in the framework of conflicts among Muslim ideologies and the spread of ISIS affiliates in Bangladesh and India, admittedly Rohingya refugee influx and illegal migration is India’s key national threat concern. India has its own peculiar historical, ideological and geopolitical considerations to consider and to adopt policies and strategies to enhance and consolidate their national security interests. Wake up – intellectually bankrupt human rights activists groups lest India is all over again plunged into communal mayhem far more badly than experienced during the 1947 partition period. Note Supreme Court please.

Read Full Post »

From Kumar Arun < >

 शमीम – भाईजान बकरीद आने वाली है और आपको हमारे घर पर होने वाली दावत में शरीक होना ही पड़ेगा कोई बहाना नहीं चलेगा।

योगी – वो सब तो ठीक है मियां पर यह तो बताओ कि बकरीद मनाते क्यों हैं ?

शमीम – भाईजान बहुत पहले एक हजरत ईब्राहिम हुए थे जिनका अल्लाह पर ईमान बहुत पुख्ता था और जिन्होंने अल्लाह के कहने पर अपनी सबसे प्यारी चीज़ यानि अपने बेटे की कुर्बानी दी थी और अल्लाह ने खुश होके उनके बेटे को फिर ज़िंदा कर दिया था। तो उसी की याद में हम भी अपनी सबसे प्यारी चीज़ की कुर्बानी देते हैं।

योगी – अच्छा मतलब आप भीअपने बेटे या किसी और करीबी की कुर्बानी देते हो इस दिन?

शमीम – लाहौल विला कुव्वत कैसी बातें करते हो भाईजान बेटे की कुर्बानी कैसे दे दें हम ? हम तो किसी जानवर की कुर्बानी देते हैं इस दिन।

योगी – क्यों समस्या क्या है इसमें? अगर आपका ईमान पुख्ता है तो अल्लाह आपके बेटे को फिर ज़िंदा कर देगा।

शमीम – अरे ऐसा कोई होता है भाईजान।

योगी – क्यों आपका ईमान पुख्ता नहीं है क्या?

शमीम – अरे नहीं भाईजान हमारा ईमान तो एकदम पुख्ता है।

योगी – तो फिर क्या अल्लाह के इंसाफ पर शुबहा है कि वो बाद में मुकर जाएगा और बेटे को ज़िंदा नहीं करेगा?

शमीम – तौबा तौबा हम अल्लाह पर शुबहा कैसे कर सकते हैं ?

योगी – अल्लाह पर भी भरोसा है। ईमान भी पुख्ता है। फिर बेटे की कुर्बानी क्यों नहीं देते ? या फिर आपको सबसे प्यारा वो जानवर है जिसकी कुर्बानी देते हो ?

शमीम – नहीं नहीं भाईजान हमें सबसे प्यारा हमारा बेटा ही है। भला बकरीद से कुछ दिन पहले बाजार से खरीदा कोई जानवर कैसे हमें हमारे बेटे से ज्यादा प्यारा हो जाएगा आप ही बताओ ?

योगी -तो मतलब आप अल्लाह से भी फरेब कर रहे हो। पैसे देकर खरीदे जानवर को औलाद से भी प्यारा बताकर अल्लाह को उसकी कुर्बानी दे रहे हो। यह तो बड़ी शर्म की बात है ।

शमीम – छोड़ें जनाब यह आपकी समझ में नहीं आएगा क्योंकि आप काफिर हो। चलते हैं हमारी नमाज़ का वक्त हो गया।

==

In effect, the Bakri Id celebration by the Muslims provides them annual exercise for practicing violence and cruelty, which then is used to do jihad and killings of the Hindus in their own homeland Hindustan.  Therefore, Bakri Id celebration must be stopped by the Gov’t; Or no Muslim should be allowed to kill any animal on any day or night so that they learn compassion to animals.  Jaya Sri Krishna! – skanda987@gmail.com

 

Read Full Post »

From: Ankur Rastogi < >

Hi All,

Please see…Below written words are not mine…All are based on Wikipedia and public document…If anyone find me wrong..kindly let me know…

Islam divides earth in two territories

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisions_of_the_world_in_Islam,

and divide humanity in two groups: momins (Muslims) and kafirs (non-Muslims)

https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AB%E0%A4%BC%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%BC%E0%A4%B0

https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A8

Islam provide right to momins to kill kafirs.

Delhi court finding .. http://www.aryavrt.com/indrseni-24ayatem-kurana

Real doings as per Koran … Fitna https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HlptyGvlIY

 

Read Full Post »

Muslims Gratidude

Please share with others.

jaya sri Krishna!

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »